CRITERIA FOR JUDGING PROPOSALS

LECTURE

 
  1. Correlation between the rationale and stated goals and between the proposed research or initiative
  2. Relevant, updated theoretical framework and literature review
  3. Methods are explicitly described and suit stated goals
  4. Major findings or outcomes are reported
  5. Relevance of discussion in view of the findings
  6. Proposal’s originality and theoretical or practical contribution, to innovation in teacher education
  7. Clarity and coherence

ONLINE LECTURE

 
  1. Correlation between the rationale and stated goals and between the proposed research or initiative
  2. Relevant, updated theoretical framework and literature review
  3. Methods are explicitly described and suit stated goals
  4. Major findings or outcomes are reported
  5. Relevance of discussion in view of the findings
  6. Proposal’s originality and theoretical or practical contribution, to innovation in teacher education
  7. Clarity and coherence

 POSTER

     
    1. Correlation between the rationale and stated goals and between the proposed research or initiative
    2. Relevant, updated theoretical framework and literature review
    3. Methods are explicitly described and suit stated goals
    4. Major findings or outcomes are reported
    5. Relevance of discussion in view of the findings
    6. Proposal’s originality and theoretical or practical contribution, to innovation in teacher education
    7. Clarity and coherence

     DISCUSSION PANEL

     
    1. Proposal’s originality and theoretical or practical contribution, to innovation in teacher education
    2. Relevant, updated theoretical framework and literature review
    3. Questions for discussion are clear, interesting and relavant
    4. Relevance and contribution of participants positions to the discussed topic
    5. Clarity and coherence

     ROUND TABLE

     
    1. Correlation between the rationale and stated goals and between the proposed research or project
    2. Relevant, updated theoretical framework and literature review
    3. Methods are explicitly described and suit stated goals
    4. Clarity of discussion questions and contribution for the topic
    5. Proposal’s originality and theoretical or practical contribution, to innovation in teacher education
    6. The research or project raises methodological or other questions, that require collaborative thinking

     WORKSHOP

     
    1. Correlation between the rationale and stated goals and between the proposed workshop
    2. The workshop is anchored in updated theoretical background
    3. The workshop relates to theory or practice or contemporary issues
    4. The workshop is innovative and original
    5. The workshop employs creatively learning tools or environment
    6. The workshop is interesting and actively involves the participant

    FIELD TRIP

     
    1. Correlation between the rationale and stated goals and between the proposed field trip
    2. The field trip is anchored in updated theoretical background
    3. The field trip relates to theory or practice or contemporary issues
    4. The field trip is innovative and original
    5. The field trip employs creatively learning tools or environment
    6. The field trip is interesting and actively involves the participants